A Peaceful Death

End-of-life care · India

A peaceful death is a human right.

How anticipatory “Just in Case” medicines could reach every home in India, so that no dying person waits in distress for a prescription.

A Kerala home at night under coconut palms, a lamp glowing in the window and a brass oil lamp lit outside
SCROLL

The starting point

Dying in comfort is a reasonable expectation, not a clinical luxury.

Freedom from uncontrolled pain, breathlessness and distress is what we would all want for our families. Nothing here needs new science.

“The gap in India is less about clinical capability and more about policy, supply and confidence, which means it can be fixed.”

01

Inexpensive medicines

The medicines cost little and the clinical knowledge is long established.

02

Not yet reaching India

Most people approaching the end of life in India still do not have them.

03

A structural gap

Policy design, supply infrastructure and prescriber confidence.

Why it is a right

Pain relief is a right. So is a peaceful death.

The same rights apply with particular force in the last days of life, when swallowing fails and help must already be in the home.

International law

ICESCR Article 12 protects the right to the highest attainable standard of health. UN General Comment 14 treats access to essential medicines as a core state obligation.

World Health Assembly

Resolution 67.19 (2014) calls on all states to build palliative care into primary health care and to ensure access to essential medicines, including opioids.

Indian Constitution

Article 21’s right to life includes dignity in dying (Common Cause v Union of India, 2018). A 2023 order simplified how advance directives are made.

PART 1 · THE UK MODEL

What is Just in Case prescribing?

Also called anticipatory prescribing: the proactive supply of injectable medicines, held in the patient’s home before symptoms arise, so that help is there at 2 am on a Sunday, not hours later.

Pain
Breathlessness
Agitation
Nausea
Respiratory secretions
An open Just in Case box with labelled vials, syringes and a signed authorisation chart Authorisation JUST IN CASE

What goes in the box

Core medicines, given under the skin

SymptomCommonly used in UK practiceClass
Pain, breathlessnessMorphine (or oxycodone)Opioid
Agitation, distressMidazolamBenzodiazepine
Nausea, vomitingCyclizine, levomepromazine or haloperidolAntiemetic
Respiratory secretionsHyoscine butylbromide or glycopyrroniumAntimuscarinic
DiluentWater for injection—

One drug often covers two symptoms. A small, cheap, largely generic list. Choice and doses follow local formularies and kidney function; doses are deliberately not shown.

In practice

The life of a Just in Case box

  1. Prescribe

    When the person is recognised as likely to be in the last weeks of life, ideally alongside advance care planning.

  2. Store

    A sealed, labelled box at home, out of reach of children, with the authorisation chart beside it.

  3. Check

    Stock and expiry checked on visits; controlled drugs counted and recorded.

  4. Administer

    Community nurses, and trained carers where policy allows, give doses promptly when symptoms appear.

Behind the box

The governance that makes it safe

Every element is low-tech: a paper chart, a stock record, a training session, a shared record. This is what gives prescribers and regulators confidence.

Authorisation chart

Signed indications, dose ranges and maximum frequency, kept in the home.

Controlled drug records

Stock counts, administration records and safe disposal after death.

Training

Prescribers, community nurses and, where used, family carers.

Review

Regular review of use; escalation if doses are needed repeatedly.

Communication

Shared records so out-of-hours teams know the box exists.

Family conversation

What the medicines are for, and what they are not for. Addressing fears that they hasten death is part of the governance.

What transfers

Essential versus incidental

Essential anywhere

  • Medicines in the home before they are needed
  • A small, standard formulary
  • Clear written authorisation for each drug
  • A trained person who can give an injection under the skin
  • Honest conversation with the family

Incidental to the UK

  • Specific branded boxes and packaging
  • Electronic prescribing and shared records
  • Exact staffing models and job titles
  • 24/7 district nursing as currently organised
  • Particular drug choices where equivalents exist
PART 2 · INDIA

The gap is policy, supply and confidence. Not clinical capability.

The clinical skills exist in India. What is missing at scale is the system around them.

Medical morphine use in India collapsed after 1985

National medical consumption, indexed (1985 = 100)

Bar chart: medical morphine use fell from an index of 100 before the 1985 Act to about 3 by 1997, a fall of about 97 percent, to roughly 18 kilograms nationally. 050100 Before 19851997 −97%≈18 kg nationally

Source: Human Rights Watch, Unbearable Pain (2009).

61 million

people each year live with serious health-related suffering

Over 80%

of that suffering is in low- and middle-income countries

Under 1%

of medical opioids reach the poorest half of the world

67th of 80

India in the 2015 Quality of Death Index (40th of 40 in 2010)

Sources: Knaul et al., Lancet Commission on Palliative Care and Pain Relief (2018); Economist Intelligence Unit, Quality of Death Index (2010, 2015).

Quality of Death Index 2015: overall score out of 100

Selected countries out of 80. Mongolia shows what a lower-income country can achieve.

Bar chart of 2015 Quality of Death scores: UK 93.9 (1st), Taiwan 83.1 (6th), Mongolia 57.7 (28th), India 26.8 (67th), Iraq 12.5 (80th). 050100 UK · 1st93.9 Taiwan · 6th83.1 Mongolia · 28th57.7 India · 67th26.8 Iraq · 80th12.5
Show as table
CountryRank (of 80)Score
UK193.9
Taiwan683.1
Mongolia2857.7
India6726.8
Iraq8012.5

Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit, The 2015 Quality of Death Index, Figure 1.2.

The legal landscape

From the 1985 NDPS Act to the 2014 amendment

India is one of the world’s largest producers of licit opium, yet had some of the lowest medical morphine use in the world.

1985–2014: the original Act

  • Separate licences from several state departments just to stock morphine
  • Fear of severe penalties for paperwork errors
  • Hospitals and pharmacies stopped stocking opioids
  • Medical morphine use fell about 97%, to 18 kg nationally by 1997

2014 amendment and 2015 Rules

  • Six Essential Narcotic Drugs: morphine, fentanyl, methadone, oxycodone, codeine, hydrocodone
  • Uniform central rules; one approval from the State Drug Controller as a Recognised Medical Institution (RMI)
  • Government hospitals are deemed RMIs if they meet the requirements and file annual consumption reports
  • Uptake remains uneven between states

The reform followed years of campaigning by Pallium India, Dr M.R. Rajagopal, the Indian Association of Palliative Care and others. Law on paper is not yet access in practice.

The 2014 amendment in detail

The problem it was fixing

The 1985 Act was built almost entirely around stopping drug trafficking. Strong opioids were regulated by each state (section 10), and many states required several licences from different departments, each with its own renewals. Many hospitals and pharmacies stopped stocking oral morphine because it was not worth the bureaucratic and legal risk.

What the amendment changes

Medical use becomes a stated purpose of the law. The Central Government must now ensure narcotic drugs are available for medical and scientific use, not just prevent misuse, a statutory duty advocates can point to.

A new category, “essential narcotic drugs”. In 2015 six were notified: morphine, fentanyl, methadone, oxycodone, codeine and hydrocodone.

Licensing moves to uniform central rules. Recognised Medical Institutions can stock and dispense them; the State Drug Controller is the single licensing authority; RMIs need staff trained in pain relief and palliative care. Existing state licences stayed valid for up to 12 months so supply was not disrupted.

Treatment and management. The Government can establish or recognise centres for treatment of drug dependence, part of a wider shift from purely punitive policy towards public health.

The parts that cut the other way

The amendment also doubled the maximum sentence for “small quantity” offences from 6 months to 1 year, let officers down to sub-inspector rank search licensed manufacturers, and expanded forfeiture of property.

Why access is still limited

Four kinds of barrier

Legislative

Uneven state implementation of the 2015 Rules and slow recognition of institutions.

Logistical

Rigid annual quotas, stock-outs of cheap generic morphine and long distances to rural homes.

Cultural

Fear that morphine means the end, and discomfort talking openly about dying.

Attitudinal

Opiophobia and low prescriber confidence; palliative care only recently added to medical curricula.

The barriers reinforce one another: little training → little prescribing → little demand on the supply chain → pharmacies stop stocking opioids → even less experience for the next generation of doctors.

Clinical illustration

Three journeys at the end of life

Illustrative composite cases, not real patients. Pathway C is a proposed model, not current practice.

A · India · no anticipatory plan

Crisis pathway

  1. Discharged home with no medicines or plan
  2. Cannot swallow; pain and agitation at midnight
  3. Overnight transfer to an ICU far away
  4. Dies in ICU, apart from family, with heavy debt
B · NHS community care

Anticipatory prescribing

  1. Advance care plan and Just in Case box at home
  2. Nurse gives injections from the box
  3. Syringe driver started at home
  4. Dies comfortably at home with family
C · Rural India · primary care

Adapted pathway

  1. The primary health centre, as a recognised institution, issues a lockable kit
  2. A palliative nurse visits; a butterfly needle is sited so doses need no new needle
  3. Unused drugs are returned to the institution
  4. Dies peacefully at home, without debt
PART 3 · BUILDING ON KERALA

Kerala has already built the foundation.

Kerala already has what the rest of India needs. Anticipatory kits are the natural next step, and Kerala is the obvious place to pilot them.

1

Community ownership

NGOs, neighbourhood networks and panchayat-funded home care under the 2008 and 2019 state policies.

2

Morphine in primary care

Opioids through primary health centres and palliative institutions, with nurse-led home visits.

3

Next: kits at home

Home care teams already visit. A kit in the home lets them, and families, act at once.

A neighbourhood network: a primary health centre at the centre connected by home-care routes to surrounding homes among palms and backwaters, each home holding a small kit PHC

A proposal for India

A tiered anticipatory kit

Oral and under-the-tongue routes first; injections where a nurse or confident carer is available. Builds on India’s own PALCARE home-care guidelines, which include anticipatory prescribing at the end of life.

TIER 1 · ORAL AND SUBLINGUAL

First line, where daily nursing visits are not available

  • Oral morphine solutionGiven into the cheek or under the tongue · pain, breathlessness
  • Sublingual lorazepamAnxiety, agitation
  • Oral haloperidolNausea, delirium
  • Sublingual atropine 1% dropsSecretions
TIER 2 · SUBCUTANEOUS

When trained staff are available or the oral route fails

  • Morphine, midazolam, haloperidol and cyclizine injectionsThe same core classes used in the UK box
  • Butterfly needle sited by a nurseSo a healthcare provider can give doses without a new needle each time
  • Lockable box, syringes, saline flushes and sharps binSafe storage at home
  • Unused drugs returnedFor reconciliation by the issuing institution
Points to resolve before rollout
  • Sublingual use of atropine eye drops is off-label.
  • Midazolam and lorazepam are psychotropic substances, not Essential Narcotic Drugs, so state rules for them need checking.
  • Carers giving doses through a pre-sited butterfly needs support from state nursing councils and clear standing orders.

A proposal for discussion, not prescribing guidance. Doses are deliberately omitted.

How can we achieve this in India?

A roadmap from law on paper to a kit in every home

Eight steps towards a national framework. The barriers are structural, not immovable.

  1. 1

    Make every eligible institution a working RMI

    Government hospitals are already deemed Recognised Medical Institutions if they meet the requirements. Activate them in practice, with trained staff and annual consumption reporting.

    State Drug Controllers · health departments
  2. 2

    Adopt one simple anticipatory protocol

    Build on the PALCARE guideline: a short standard formulary, a template authorisation chart and clear review rules.

    Palliative care bodies · health ministry
  3. 3

    Give nurses and carers clear standing orders

    Authorise palliative nurses to administer, and trained family carers to give doses through a pre-sited butterfly needle.

    State nursing councils
  4. 4

    Settle the psychotropic question

    Clarify how state rules treat midazolam and lorazepam in a home kit, so prescribers are not left guessing.

    Regulators · state governments
  5. 5

    Fix supply

    Realistic quotas, reliable stocks of cheap generic oral morphine, and a simple return-and-reconcile system for unused medicines.

    Drug controllers · procurement
  6. 6

    Train, and talk

    Bedside palliative training in medical colleges, roles for community health officers and ASHAs, and honest conversations with families about what the medicines are and are not for.

    Medical & nursing colleges · communities
  7. 7

    Pilot in Kerala, and measure it

    Add kits to existing home-care teams. Measure place of death, crisis admissions, symptom control, safety and cost, adding evidence the field currently lacks.

    Kerala home-care networks · panchayats
  8. 8

    Scale into a national framework

    Adapt the model to each state’s community nursing capacity and regional diversity.

    National and state governments

Structural, not immovable

No dying person should wait in distress for a prescription.

The UK model is simple at its core. India’s barriers are structural rather than immovable. Kerala proves local ownership works. A national framework adapted to India is achievable.